Calls for Papers

Journal Events

Submit Your Work

REEM welcomes submissions from researchers working in heterodox economics, economic methodology, history of economic thought, and related fields. Authors should consult the submission guidelines before sending manuscripts.

View submission guidelines →

The Review of Economics and Economic Methodology provides an open forum for scholarship that challenges mainstream orthodoxy and embraces pluralist perspectives. Rooted in a commitment to intellectual diversity, the journal welcomes contributions that draw on classical political economy, Marxian theory, Keynesian analysis, institutional economics, and other heterodox traditions. By fostering dialogue across competing frameworks, the publication aims to deepen understanding of economic phenomena that conventional approaches often obscure or dismiss.

Methodological reflection lies at the heart of the journal's identity. Rather than treating economic methods as neutral tools, the Review encourages authors to interrogate the assumptions, limitations, and conceptual errors embedded in standard modeling practices. From general equilibrium frameworks to quantitative techniques derived from the natural sciences, each methodological choice carries philosophical commitments that shape the questions economists ask and the answers they find persuasive.

Contemporary economic challenges demand more than technical refinement of established models. Rising inequality, financial instability, ecological pressures, and shifting global trade relations call for theoretical innovation grounded in historical and institutional analysis. The journal publishes research that connects abstract theory to concrete social realities, exploring how power relations, cultural norms, and political structures mediate economic outcomes in ways that purely formal approaches cannot capture.

The journal maintains rigorous peer-review standards while remaining accessible to scholars across disciplines. Each issue brings together research articles, methodological essays, and book reviews that speak to economists, sociologists, political scientists, and philosophers alike. By insisting on clarity and scholarly integrity, the Review demonstrates that pluralism and academic excellence are complementary commitments rather than competing priorities.

Special issues and thematic sections allow the journal to examine pressing topics in sustained depth. Recent volumes have addressed controversies in trade policy, the legacy of classical political economy, the problematic foundations of marginal productivity theory, and the complex relation between statistics and economic explanation. These focused discussions create space for nuanced debate that transcends the constraints of mainstream journal formats.

The journal's editorial vision recognizes that economics cannot be separated from its social and ethical dimensions. Questions of distribution, solidarity, and the common good are not external to economic analysis but constitutive of it. By publishing work that engages with these normative concerns openly rather than hiding them behind technical apparatus, the Review contributes to a more honest and relevant economic discourse.

International in scope and collaborative in spirit, the Review draws authors and readers from diverse academic communities around the world. This global orientation reflects an understanding that economic knowledge is shaped by national traditions, linguistic contexts, and institutional settings. Comparative perspectives enrich the journal's content and help guard against the parochialism that sometimes accompanies claims to universal scientific validity.

The journal is particularly attentive to the history of economic thought as a living resource rather than a museum piece. Engaging with Ricardo, Marx, Keynes, and other foundational thinkers is not an antiquarian exercise but a way of recovering insights and controversies that remain pertinent to twenty-first-century problems. Historical awareness helps economists recognize the contingency of their own assumptions and the possibility of alternative analytical paths.

By sustaining a space for heterodox research and methodological critique, the Review of Economics and Economic Methodology serves as both a scholarly resource and an institutional counterweight to intellectual monopoly in the discipline. Its ongoing project is to demonstrate that economics can be rigorous, pluralistic, and socially relevant without sacrificing any of these qualities to the others.